mileberg.louie

The Online Idea of Seasoning and Recent experiments and sucesses exploring South Asian and African Cooking

I want to preface this by saying I am writing this blog mere minutes after finishing dinner. It was so unbelievably delicious that I wanted to keep some sort of record of it. As a person who is very critical of their cooking and always thinks they could have done better, this dinner wasn’t one of those times. There is nothing I look back on and think I could have done better. Writing this also provides an opportunity to share recent cooking thoughts I’ve had and things I believe in.

The online idea of seasoning

I spend a lot of time watching cooking videos on YouTube. I believe it is the best way to learn how to cook. Watching different techniques across different cuisines almost subconsciously teaches you how to cook. Initially, you may be watching a video to follow a particular recipe from a particular cuisine, but without knowing it you are learning so many techniques like deglazing, searing, and braising. Over time, you become confident enough in their uses that you can apply them across different cuisines and dishes. (I think this last paragraph effectively sums up what I was trying to say in my WIP chilli blog—it will be released soon.)

However, I always find myself in the comments of these videos seeing people saying things like “Chicken’s underseasoned,” “No seasoning,” and I truthfully believe they just don’t know what they’re talking about. I want this to lead into a very pretentious point about what I believe seasoning is.

I think a lot of people seem to believe the whole idea of seasoning is to use jarred powders and chuck them into a dish. This is bad, but I think it’s worse that this seems to be the generally accepted idea of “seasoning.” I’m going to try and explain this idea I have in my head of the spice bell curve.

This analogy came to me from an experience. When I was living with other people, one of my flatmates put beef into a pan and ate it with microwaved rice. When my other flatmates were making fun of him for eating this, they were saying, “He didn’t even season it,” “There’s no seasoning.” In their heads, the idea of seasoning would be to put paprika, mixed herbs, and oregano on the beef, and therefore it’s seasoned. I don’t believe this to be the case. If you were to put paprika, mixed herbs, and oregano on this beef, it would then taste like beef with paprika, mixed herbs, and oregano on it. To me, this analogy makes sense.

Picture a bell curve in your head. We are going to imagine an arrow along the x-axis that points to the right. This arrow is labelled “Learning to cook.” On the left (the beginner side), you have people who don’t season at all. In the middle, you have the average home cook, where you are seasoning with spices—exactly like my flatmates who chuck jarred powders into a dish. Now, who am I to say this is the average way of thinking, but based on the amount of comments I see, as I mentioned previously, I’m going to say it is. On the other side (the more experienced cook), you have a better idea of how to season dishes. I guess what I’m trying to say with this analogy is that there’s a middle ground where people think, “Yes, I am making a delicious dish with all these spices and seasonings,” when in reality, you probably are not.

So what is the difference between the experienced cook and the average cook when it comes to seasoning? I believe it’s this idea of complementary seasoning. For example, putting paprika into some beef isn’t going to make it taste “good.” However, putting paprika into a charred tomato and pepper shakshuka will enhance the smokiness created from the charred tomatoes, complement the sweetness of the tomato, and therefore add more overall depth.

Now let’s say you never added paprika to this shakshuka. It would still taste delicious. This is because there is so much flavour brought in by the tomatoes and peppers; the paprika is only there to add depth, NOT TO FLAVOUR. This is my main point when addressing my thoughts on seasoning. You can’t put spices into a dish and expect it to make it taste good. They should take a much more background position in a dish and be present to complement and enhance the flavours at the front.

There is so much flavour potential in vegetables, it’s almost a shame to cover them in dry spices. A classic example is in a bolognese. When you are cooking down the soffritto (carrots, onion, and celery), after about 20 minutes give the pot a smell. It will smell INCREDIBLE. There’s no seasoning in there, no jarred spices, it’s just fresh vegetables. These are what should always be used to create a dish.

Apologies if this seems like an almost irrelevant and overly long rant about a silly topic; however, I thought it was an important thing to address, as it was on my mind while exploring South Asian and African cuisines.

The importance of aromatics

So how do we address this seasoning issue in order to create better dishes? It all comes down to this idea of aromatics in cooking. If you don’t know what they are, here is the Google definition of aromatics:

In cooking, aromatics are fragrant vegetables, herbs, and spices (like onions, garlic, carrots, celery, ginger, bay leaves, thyme) that form a flavor base for dishes, releasing deep aromas and tastes when heated in fat (oil/butter) at the start of cooking to build a rich foundation for soups, sauces, stews, and curries, creating depth and complexity.

This definition is exactly what I was getting at with my points about seasoning. It’s almost as if there’s an accepted idea that jarred seasoning will “form a flavour base for the dish,” but it won’t. That is the job of the aromatics.

Sri Lanka

To try and get this point across, I’ll give an example. I recently made a Sri Lankan chicken curry from scratch. It wasn’t my first time making a curry from scratch; however, it was the most recent, so I’ll talk about it. I had an idea in my head of how to approach the dish. Like all my curries, it would be built off “seasoned aromatics.”

I made up a Sri Lankan–inspired spice blend using both fresh and dried spices, and then beat up my aromatics in a pestle and mortar. This was simply fresh chilli, ginger, and garlic. I also had some onions on a low heat, slowly caramelising. Therefore, our aromatics were chilli, ginger, garlic, and onion. These add so much flavour and backbone to the dish, and when combined with the Sri Lankan spice blend, everything works together. The sweetness of the onions complements the spice of the chilli and cuts through the bitterness of the black peppercorns. The ground cinnamon balances with the sharpness of the ginger. What I’m trying to say is that every spice in the blend and every aromatic had almost an equal pair that complemented it, and thus “justified” its addition to the dish.

Here is another example,

Morocco

This aromatic base for curries can absolutely be applied to different dishes and different cuisines. For example, tonight I took inspiration from Africa, and specifically Morocco. I’ve delved into Moroccan-style cooking in the past, but nothing compared to tonight’s dinner with this new philosophy of aromatics applied to it.

I started by making up a Moroccan-inspired spice blend—my own take on ras el hanout, a blend prominent in the dishes of North Africa. I used:

Aromatics: Fresh chillies, ginger, garlic

Spices: 7 cardamom pods, ½ tsp mustard seeds, ½ tsp coriander seeds, 1 tsp cumin, a pinch of paprika, cinnamon, ½ grated nutmeg, and a pinch of turmeric

I put chicken drumsticks into a bowl with oil, then covered them in the spices and aromatics. This was left to marinate for 10 minutes while I prepped other things.

I knew I was going to make some form of chicken and rice, but this can be prepared in so many different ways. As this was centred around Morocco, I decided to lean towards a tagine-style approach, where you add the meat and vegetables to create a flavourful broth and make a sort of stew.

I heated some oil in a frying pan and added all the chicken and flavoured aromatics. I let this sear and develop fragrance for about 10 minutes. I then added onions, carrots, broccoli, and courgette, followed by enough liquid to almost submerge everything. I covered it with a foil lid, reduced the heat, and let it simmer.

In the meantime, I put on some rice. I knew I didn’t want plain rice with this, as I couldn’t justify it. In my head, if I have plain rice, I must be having some very flavourful sauce with it, for example a curry. However, in this case, the rice was its own part of the dish, so it had to be delicious in its own right. I heated some oil in a pan, added the remaining ras el hanout, and let it “burn.” Burning is a technique originally from Jamaican cooking and refers to heating spices in oil at a high temperature to allow them to release their fragrance. I then added ginger and garlic, followed by the rice. I covered it with water, brought it to a boil, and then let it simmer.

Once the rice was on, I checked back on my “tagine” and saw that it was already done. The vegetables were just cooked through and the chicken was cooked, but there was far too much liquid left in the pan. My mind went to some sort of curry, maybe I could turn this into a sauce if I reduced it enough? However, I wasn’t sure if a water-based sauce would lack flavour. Knowing that the rice was nowhere near done, I decided to remove all the contents of the tagine into a separate bowl and leave just the liquid to reduce. I turned the heat up and brought it to an aggressive boil to reduce it as quickly as possible.

After 15 minutes, I realised there was still far too much liquid to turn it into a decent pan sauce, but there was also too much flavour from the chicken, vegetables, and aromatics to waste it. I figured it would make a great stock to cook rice in. So, I strained the pot of half-done rice that had been cooking in the spiced ginger and garlic liquid and transferred it into this tagine liquid. After another 15 minutes of careful heat control and allowing a socarrat to form (a technique commonly used in paella to create a crust on the bottom layer of the rice), the rice was ready. I added back all the vegetables, which had partially broken down into the rice, along with the chicken, and plated it all up.

It was unbelievably delicious. I paired it with a cucumber and carrot salad dressed in mango chutney and softened desiccated coconut, which beautifully cut through the spice of the rice. It was a 10/10.

Conclusion

I guess my main point with this post is to highlight the importance of fresh vegetable aromatics in cooking and how they completely change a dish. I think following this as a guiding principle for future recipes should elevate your cooking to another level.

My experience and struggle cooking a good Italian style bolognese + new recipe:

On the 23rd of December 2024 i posted, 'louie milebergs famous bolognaise recipe'. At the time of writing this up, i believed i had fine-tuned the classic ragu well enough to post this perfect recipe. However, as of now (16th of February 2025) i disagree with what i wrote in the original, and am here to amend it with reasoning.

Big Disclaimer: Not to get too bulked down on what makes a good 'traditional' bolognese, as i believe recipes should only be used as a guide and should be adjusted to however you may want. Theres a huge discussion on whether to include garlic in a bolognese, and during my recent bolognese epiphany of the last week, i was chatting to a mate from Naples and they said do not put garlic in for traditional sake. So here ive chosen not to. However this recipe is a mere guide and how i would chose to go about it, if you like garlic put some in or anything you want itll still be delicious. But here my goal was deliciousness and traditional, so i will follow that in the recipe.

Sofrito: – 1 Large onion – 4 ribs of celery – 2 carrots – With a fine dice on all

Ragu: – Ground beef (90/10 or 80/20) – Tomato Paste – Beef stock cube – Dry red wine – Fresh herbs of your choice (Bayleaf, thyme, basil) – Water

Step 1: Heat up an oven-proof safe pot on a medium heat (4/5) with a splash of olive oil. No need for excessive amounts

Step 2: Once you believe the oil is heated, you will test it. Add a small amount of your sofrito into the pan and listen out, you want to hear an immediate sizzle when the veg hits the oil. If not, let it heat up for a few more minutes. If an immediate sizzle, add in the rest.

Step 3: Cook on a low heat for around 25 minutes, it should almost blend all together and be soft and nearly dissolve into 1. There should be no visible chunks of any veg if the dice was fine enough. I like to mash the veg around with a wooden spoon just to crush it up even finer.

Step 4: When the veg is soft and a mass of 1, push to the side and add in our beef. We should still have a bit of oil on the bottom of our pan. Break the ground beef up into small chunks and push it down into the oil making good contact with the oil and base of the pan. I like to do mine in small batches. Here we will leave these to brown. Constantly check for browning on the bottom of the searing beef to make sure its browning or not burning.

Step 5: After maybe 4/5 ish minutes we flip the beef and repeat on the other side but just aim to cook out the raw colour. Once finished, push beef into the pile of veg and make it fuse into 1. Then add in the rest of the ground beef (if chose to be done in batches) and then once rawness cooked out just fuse into the pile of beefy veg.

Step 6: Add in the tomato paste just maybe a table spoon and a bit. Leave it to fry in the bottom of the pan for a maybe a minute just to cook out the rawness. Then use wooden spoon to mix into the veg and beef.

Step 7: Adding in the wine. I first initally push the beef pile onto one side, turn the heat up and pour in a small amount of wine almost creating a small well of wine thatll quickly evapourate. I believe both cooking with your nose and heat control is important here. Turn the heat up after the wine goes in and it should immediately start to boil, you should get hit with a strong alcohol up your nose that makes you take a step back. Once this first bit of wine has cooked out, add in more and push the veg/beef into it. Lower heat back to medium, add in more wine – I ended up using about just over 1/3 of the bottle and just let it cook out for around 5 minutes.

Step 8: Add in beef stock cube and then fill up with water. This will be cooking low and slow for hours in the oven (or stove i just chose oven) so too much liquid doesnt matter. We have a lot of time to reduce.

Step 9: Bring up to a simmer, and place into a preheated oven of around 120 degrees c with a lid slightly cracked. Cook for an hour, hour and a half maybe and there would be slight reduction. Cooking time really varies, i today had mine cooking for about 3 and a half hours in total. Your time can be completely adjusted to fit your needs. It is just important to cook uncovered to allow brownness to develop on the side of the dish. This can be scraped with a wooden spoon into the sauce – check on this regularly.

Step 10: Serve with pasta and enjoy

What led me to believe the original recipe needed adjusting: During my week-long bolognese ephinany, id be reading about how a blend of pork and beef should really be used for a bolognese. I had remembered seeing a packet sold in lidl which contained 250g of ground beef and 250g of ground pork – so i thought would be perfect. However, the only item i could find was a 500g blend of both pork and ground beef and thought id take a punt and try it. I believe this bolognese was genuinely unenjoyable and almost horrible.

I had 2 problems with it – The meat flavour was horrible – It was overly sweet

This cheap lidl pork beef blend allowed me to realise the importance of high quality beef in a bolognese, as at its forefront it is a meat sauce. The cheap pork flavour with the overly sweetness was really really bad and i couldnt end up finishing it. (Read on for overly sweetness)

Changes from the original:

From 1 to 2 carrots in the sofrito and the importance of a fine dice:

This is our first change from the original recipe. I initially stated to use 1 carrot as theyre quite sweet, and did state a fine-dice was needed. However ive realised 2 carrots is more appropriate and i cannot emphaise enough the importance of a fine dice. When i used to make it, i didnt dice the carrot up enough – and whilst the onion and celery would blend and dissolve into the meat sauce – the carrot would always remain structured and almost leave chunks throughout. Biting down on these chunks would add unneccessary sweetness and sometimes made the dish far too sweet and really not great. Ive since learnt the importance of a FINE dice, we need these carrots small so they are able to blend into the sauce. Because of the removal of chunks, ive found using more carrots (1 to 2) is important as the sweetness is more subtle and not a complete burst of overpowering sweet flavour.

Removal of the draining of fat colinder method:

Cant be bothered to do this , dont believe theres any need just scape fat off using spoon after cooking if really can be bothered but doesnt make a difference – unless using unbelievably fatty beef then no need i dont think.

Removal of tinned tomatoes:

The biggest change in this recipe is the removal of the tins of tomatoes. Any bolognese ive ever really made at its core was a tomato meat sauce. However, traditionally a bolognese is a meat sauce at its front, and i think is actually better without an overpowering tomato flavour. Whilst there are hints (the added tomato paste), it is more used to add body to the sauce and less tomato flavour itself. I think removing the tinned tomatos allow the flavours of the sofrito to shine and create a much richer and more enjoyable meat sauce compared to the tomato-based one we might commonly know.

More wine and added beef stock:

Quite obvious, due to lack of any tomato flavour we add more wine adding more richness and flavour to the meat sauce. I believe viewing the way to cook a bolognese almost as if its a red-wine braised stew allows for a more delicious flavour and overall better experience. Furthermore, using beef stock just creates an meatier flavour with more body and thus makes more sense than just plain water.

My first experience cooking the new bolognese, important notes and friends reviews:

Tonight i attempted to make my new developed recipe and it was overall a success. The ragu was deliciouslly rich and a very enjoyable meal.

However, there are some important disclaimers i must make:

When i made this today, i only used 1 carrot in my sofrito due to my past experiences of over-sweetness. Here in the recipe ive doubled it to 2. I found that the ragu would have benefited with a more round flavour of sweetness and i ended up adding sugar to fight off the dry-ness of the red wine.

Furthermore, i found the ragu to be slightly overseasoned. I would always salt at every stage when making my initial ragu and didnt think to do anything different today. However, due to the new addition of beef stock – that contians a high amount of sodium which led to the sauce being too salty. I was able to combat this by not salting my pasta water, and adding some acid (lemon juice) to take the salty edge off. I also believe the addition of an extra carrot like in the point above would have been able to fight some of the salt.

I cooked this ragu for the first time hosting dinner for 2 of my mates and was met with raving reviews:

One guest stated: 'Wow this is amazing', 'I've had worse in restaurants'

Another guest stated: 'This isnt too salty' – but they have a serious sodium palette problem

Overall i believe this was a success and i will be cooking my bolognese like this onwards.

Alice In Chains – Dirt: A review

having first stumbling accross alice in chains through spotify in 2019, i was immediately drawn to their album 'Dirt' (1992) due to the fact it was the album containing their most popular song 'them bones'. i gave them bones a listen and realised it was brilliant. I then queued the rest of the album and listened to it on repeat for a very long time. This is an album ive always known very well and had a strong appreciation for.

However, it wasnt until recently (last few months) that i rediscovered this album after it being a long time without listening, and properly started to appreicate it for what it is. This album comes out of the so called 'grunge' period, an era in the early to mid 90's where a hard-rock scene appeared out of seattle washington, creating what are really known as the 'Big 4': Nirvana, Pearl-Jam, Soundgarden and Alice In Chains. Nirvana of course went to become a large commercial success, and i believe to an extent pearl-jam too. However soundgarden (outside of the success of Black-Hole Sun) and especially alice in chains always flew under the radar commerically and were often seen only within the grunge scene and comparitavely never did as well commerically.

Alice in chains in my eyes were always the darkest of the 4, which i think dirt perfectly captures. Their first album facelift released two years prior, is their least dark album and takes a more almost fun spin on the theme of drugs, saying really how they use and enjoy them. Dirt i think is more of a turning point, where the music and lyrics perfectlly capture the moment of realisation where the drugs were becoming a problem. They were no longer a fun thing to take, singer Layne Staley knew he was dependent and had become an addict. Alice in chains went to release their third and final album 3 years later, which feels nothing but hopeless and horrid. Laynes life had been taken over and the music reflects this. 7 years later Layne died of a drug overdose.

Even without knowing this context, dirt is an incredible album. From an instrumental perspective the riffs and music are just unbelievable. Jerry cantrell was albe to write such catchy guitar riffs that create a brilliant atmosphere. However i believe the riffs are able really shine when put alongside the lyrics. For example, the song Sickman constantly changes tempo and does not keep a musical idea for a long time. I believe this is reflected in Laynes lyrics, initally saying how he'll want to become clean from drugs before he dies ('I wont rest until my head is clear'). However this is immediately switched up lyrically and instrumentally with later saying ('what's the difference ill die, in this sick world of mine'). This constant changing creates such a dark atmosphere for the song which is promeninent throughout the entire album.

The whole theme of drug addiction throughout is not one i can relate to, but i dont believe it stops the album from resonating so strongly with me at all. I just think every song is an absoutle banger and just knowing the wider context surrounding it helps me appreicate it more. This is in my opinion the best album to come out of the 'grunge' era, as it is genuienly flawless. And is in my top 5 albums OAT. Definitely worth listening to

louie milebergs famous bolognaise recipe:

mirepoix: – 1 white or red onion doesnt matter – couple sticks of celery – 1 carrot dont go for too much carrot theyre quite sweet

ragu: -ground beef ideally use something like 80/20 -2 tins of tomatos want good quality tomatos -tomato paste -fresh basil if youve got it doesnt matter if not use dried basil -dry red wine

step 1: heat up a cast iron pot to a high ish heat and add good quality olive oil. if using a fattier beef for eg 80/20 dont add much oil. but if using something leaner like 95/5 add more oil.

step 2: add in beef once oil is screaming hot and get a good sear. leave for a good 5 ish minutes on 1 side to get browning and add salt at this point and then start to break up once got good brown bits all round pot

step 3: once beef browned on all sides put into a strainer with bowl underneath and drain off the excess fat. then add more olive oil and add the mirepoix we need a serious fine dice we do not want chunks maybe even grate the mirepoix instead of chopping to get it really fine

step 4 add more olive oil in and then we need to sweat the vegetables until really soft over medium heat we need them to almost dissolve to nothing also add salt to draw out the moisture id say about 15/20 mins of sweating. preheat oven to like 120 degrees c at this point

step 5 add in your tomato paste at this point doesnt matter how much really just make sure to 'cook it out' (add it into the pan on its own, do not let it touch the vegetables. id say about 2 minutes of frying it around on its own and you should smell it) tomato paste is typically quite tinny i think and if you cook it out you should smell the tinniness. once cooked out mix it in with the vegetables and everything should get sort of thicker.

step 6 add beef back in at this point and mix all together for a few mins. should start to brown on the bottom and then add in the wine to deglaze. turn heat to medium high at this point and then let the wine simmer out. you should be smelling constantly you can smell the alcohol leaving and scrape up and brown bits off the bottom theyre serious flavour. id say let it evapourate out for about 7 minutes but really just go until you cannot smell the alcohol anymore use as much wine as you want

step 7 add in the chopped tomatos and then rinse the cans out with water. ragu should be super watery at this point so bring to a simmer and then cover with a lid. add basil in at this point. place into an oven and cook for however long i normally do like 1 hour with lid on and then 45 minutes lid cracked and then like 20 minutes uncovered and then eat. if dont have oven proof dish you can do on stovetop leave it at a simmer for HOURS and stir every so often so the bottom doesnt burn

step 8 serve with your choice of pasta and enjoy